DNA & Rh-
http://sacredgeometryinternational.com/sangreal-cosmic-grail-alchemical-evolution-part-11
Trangenerational Process
QUESTION 5: Can I help the spirit of my dead father by trying to live in accordance with the demands of the unconscious?
Dr. Jung: Yes, provided—one must always add—that the spirit of the dead father [remains a living idea].
I call this idea hygienic, because when I think that way everything is right in my psychic life and when I don't think that way everything goes wrong, then somewhere things don't click, at least in the biological sense.
~Carl Jung, C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters, Pages 383-386.
Obviously, all genealogy is transgenerational. What distinguishes Transgenerational Genealogy from conventional or Jungian approaches is plunging deeper into the Medieval, legendary, and mythic layers of one's pedigree, rather than just the first few generations. But we can not concentrate only on the royal lines, because many other descents far out number them. Genetically, they have no priority.
As someone's descendant we answer the call. The transgenerational group is integrated within the individual. For Jung, fantasy is an integrative function. Imaginative expressions of hidden forces appear spontaneously as the direct expression of psychic life, creative and imaginative activity.
Our lineage is our own personal Mystery Play. We can allow the phenomena to speak - the multitude of personalities to speak, to be personified. Images are also voices -- messages from the dead. We need a sense of the ancestors. “The lived body” is a receptacle of past experiences, of a knowing that bypasses knowledge.
They can also impress themselves on us. The children of the traumatized have always carried their parents’ suffering under their skin. Some carry secrets more slippery, combustible and secret than sex and more dangerous than any shadow or ghost.” Epigenetics transmits the experiences of one generation which insinuate themselves into the next.
https://newrepublic.com/article/120144/trauma-genetic-scientists-say-parents-are-passing-ptsd-kids
Being is an aspect of non-being.
Non-being is no different than being.
Until you understand this Truth,
You won't see anything clearly.
One is all...All are One.
When you realize this,
What reason for holiness or wisdom?
~Seng Ts'an~
QUESTION 5: Can I help the spirit of my dead father by trying to live in accordance with the demands of the unconscious?
Dr. Jung: Yes, provided—one must always add—that the spirit of the dead father [remains a living idea].
I call this idea hygienic, because when I think that way everything is right in my psychic life and when I don't think that way everything goes wrong, then somewhere things don't click, at least in the biological sense.
~Carl Jung, C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters, Pages 383-386.
Obviously, all genealogy is transgenerational. What distinguishes Transgenerational Genealogy from conventional or Jungian approaches is plunging deeper into the Medieval, legendary, and mythic layers of one's pedigree, rather than just the first few generations. But we can not concentrate only on the royal lines, because many other descents far out number them. Genetically, they have no priority.
As someone's descendant we answer the call. The transgenerational group is integrated within the individual. For Jung, fantasy is an integrative function. Imaginative expressions of hidden forces appear spontaneously as the direct expression of psychic life, creative and imaginative activity.
Our lineage is our own personal Mystery Play. We can allow the phenomena to speak - the multitude of personalities to speak, to be personified. Images are also voices -- messages from the dead. We need a sense of the ancestors. “The lived body” is a receptacle of past experiences, of a knowing that bypasses knowledge.
They can also impress themselves on us. The children of the traumatized have always carried their parents’ suffering under their skin. Some carry secrets more slippery, combustible and secret than sex and more dangerous than any shadow or ghost.” Epigenetics transmits the experiences of one generation which insinuate themselves into the next.
https://newrepublic.com/article/120144/trauma-genetic-scientists-say-parents-are-passing-ptsd-kids
Being is an aspect of non-being.
Non-being is no different than being.
Until you understand this Truth,
You won't see anything clearly.
One is all...All are One.
When you realize this,
What reason for holiness or wisdom?
~Seng Ts'an~
POLE FLIP GENETICS & SUPERNOVA
41,000 BP pole flip > Increased radiation > DNA mutations
Widespread Major Mutations
41,000 BP pole flip > Increased radiation > DNA mutations
Widespread Major Mutations
PALEOPOETICS
The Life of the Past Nourishes and Shapes the Present
With an average of fifteen years per generation, the ancestral artists of Lascaux and Chauvet, who painted the living walls of those dim caverns, lived approximately 18,000 and 33,000 generations ago (15,000 - 30,000 or 32,000 years old). Genealogy is the labyrinth of our ancestral self and we leave our handprint at the entrance when we commence our initiatory journey to the depths.
Arche is a Greek word with primary senses "beginning", "origin" or "source of action". (εξ’ ἀρχής: from the beginning, οr εξ’ ἀρχής λόγος: the original argument), and later first principle or element, principles of knowledge (ἀρχαί) (Aristot. Metaph. 995b8). By extension, it may mean "first place, power", "method of government", "empire, realm", "authorities" (in plural: ἀρχαί), "command".[1]
The first principle or element corresponds to the "ultimate underlying substance" and "ultimate undemonstrable principle".[2], designates the source, origin or root of things that exist, the element or principle of a thing.
We now have a pretty good estimate of how many ancestors our own species had at various times in the past. Our ancestors went through two different phases of population “bottlenecking” (constriction): one occurred about three million years ago, when a large population declined to around 10,000 individuals. The authors note that while this may reflect population size decline associated with the origin of hominins after our split with the lineage that produced modern chimps, they also say that this could be an artifact of ancient genetic polymorphisms maintained by natural selection.
The second bottleneck is the one of interest, for it’s the one associated with a reduced population size as humans left Africa. For the Chinese, Korean, and European genomes, effective population size fell from about 13,500 (at 150,000 years ago) to about 1200 between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago. Now this is the effective population size, almost certainly an underestimate of census size, but that only makes the problem worse:
we never went through a bottleneck of anything near two individuals,
as the Biblical Adam-and-Eve story suggests.
We also see a somewhat less severe bottleneck in the African samples: from about 16,100 people about 100,000-150,000 years ago to 5,700 about 50,000 years ago. It’s not clear why the populations in Africa bottlenecked as well.Finally, we also see the population recover in size, with a huge increase in all populations beginning roughly 20,000 years ago. This clearly reflects population growth in both Africa and in areas colonized from Africa as humans expanded around the globe.
ANCESTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY
Genealogy: What We Are & Where We Come From
Genealogy is the archaeology of the soul, offering new depths of insight into ethnography, lineage and kinship. It looks beyond regional, continental, and psychic barriers. A coherence is experienced from within, bringing forth that which was formerly hidden. It includes not only the personal connections, but the myths of life-after-death and life-before-birth —the simultaneous reality of spirit and matter.
Commit the Body to the Ground
Genealogy becomes a radical embrace of the earth, our psychophysical ground and structural foundation. The common ground of psyche and matter is "deep" psychophysical correlates. Jung's psychoid realm is the physical and metaphysical ground of being. The divine masculine and feminine are primordial dimensions of reality.
In Mysterium Coniunctionis, Jung explained that the unus mundus corresponds with this transcendental psychophysical background of vast potential. Psyche and matter continuously emerge from that transcendental matrix -- the eternal presence of the singular creative act. We emerge from the broader universe that supports us.
Figure-Ground Modulation
Shared knowledge is the common ground -- shared "grounding." It teaches us to read our psychophysical landscape back to our own creation myth, grounded in universal creation motifs. It symbolizes the ultimate meaning of our own existence, and that of the cosmos.
By consciously descending into the depths, descending toward primordial time, into our long-buried past, we ignite a light in the darkness. The ancestors are figures of time and meaning.
Transgenerational Psychophysical Ground
Everything is already there from the beginning in the unconscious. We now know deep memory and heredity are closely linked. "Retrieval" doesn't mean the *same* but rather a "memory" of behaviors and attitudes that had previously been "forgotten." We dig, then dig deeper, and sift, and sort looking for some shred of new evidence because we feel it in our bones.
Jung notes, "The dissolution of our time-bound form in eternity brings no loss of meaning." (Letters Vol. 1, Page 343.) He described his vision: "The bodies are the individual lives, twisting and turning and writhing themselves into a sort of pattern that dissolves and reforms again and again. It is the river of time, of life, in other words." (Visions Seminar, Page 321)
Don't Forget They Were Our Creators
Genealogy is a living demonstration of the newness of the old as well as the oldness of the new. According to Jung, when a personal experience corresponds to a latent primordial image, an archetype is activated. The new model is contemplation, participation, comprehension, poesis. Poetry has a way of "plumbing the depths." Human consciousness is an embodied self-referential system, symbolized in Uroboros.
Esther Harding describes how Jung "found a symbol of the psychic structure which joins into an organic unity everything from the mineral world through the animal, the unconscious and ordinary consciousness up to the Anthropos, which is quality-less and so, like the old Uroboros, touches the primordial condition of Chaos with its forces constituting matter, from which the whole cycle springs again." (C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters and Encounters, 171-179). Genealogy is a potent symbol of such a notion.
Gene Tree
The genealogy chart is a way to visualize and navigate the set of reconstructed ancestors, and narratives of pressures faced by our own ancestors. Everything about us as individuals is a product of complex interactions between our genetic instructions and aspects of the environments in which they are expressed [epigenetics]. If experience is not coming from the body it's not 'known' and going to change your life. The body contains the feeling which the soul gives the creative opportunity to expand.
Everyone alive today is descended from a long, long line of successful ancestors. There is a very good reason we rely on heuristics – evolution. Our distant ancestors when faced with complex life-threatening problems didn’t have time to weigh up the situation, so developed quick-fire methods.
Probabilities
But our ancient ancestors had access to little data other than their own ... Instead, they use quick and dirty heuristics that are less than perfect but that work well. Those that worked were passed down through generations, and we are still relying on them, often when we shouldn’t.
What advantage do we, humans, have? One is the ability to solve new problems, those on which evolution did not train generations of our ancestors. The brain has evolved many mental shortcuts, or heuristics. Heuristic shortcuts evolved that helped our ancestors deal with political problems in small-scale social groups.
However, the world we currently live in is radically different from the world our ancestors lived in when these mental heuristics evolved. In some instances heuristics can lead us to misjudge and make mistakes due to the biases that heuristics can blind us to.
Sense and Sensibility
True, the "sense" is often something that could just as well be called "nonsense," for there is a certain incommensurability between the mystery of existence and human understanding. ~Carl Jung, CW 12, Page 222
"Sense" and "nonsense" are merely man-made labels which serve to give us a reasonably valid sense of direction. ~Carl Jung, Psychology and Alchemy, Page 222
The pendulum of the mind alternates between sense and nonsense, not between right and wrong. ~Carl Jung, Memories Dreams and Reflections, Page 154.
Dreams Reach Forward; Wonder Reaches Back
How can we look at something and claim to know it if our own flesh isn't included? Instinct is felt physiologically and experienced as numinous images that seem to contrast to mere bodily sensations and mechanisms.
Archetypes are instincts "raised to a high frequency," just as instincts emanate from an archetype's "low frequency." Just as instincts impel toward behavior, the archetypes impel toward certain kinds of perceptions. Our task is to find our destiny lived from the wholeness or totality of our being.
People would rather hang on to the old dogmas than let experience speak.
--Jung, Letters Vol. II, Pages 598-599
The Life of the Past Nourishes and Shapes the Present
With an average of fifteen years per generation, the ancestral artists of Lascaux and Chauvet, who painted the living walls of those dim caverns, lived approximately 18,000 and 33,000 generations ago (15,000 - 30,000 or 32,000 years old). Genealogy is the labyrinth of our ancestral self and we leave our handprint at the entrance when we commence our initiatory journey to the depths.
Arche is a Greek word with primary senses "beginning", "origin" or "source of action". (εξ’ ἀρχής: from the beginning, οr εξ’ ἀρχής λόγος: the original argument), and later first principle or element, principles of knowledge (ἀρχαί) (Aristot. Metaph. 995b8). By extension, it may mean "first place, power", "method of government", "empire, realm", "authorities" (in plural: ἀρχαί), "command".[1]
The first principle or element corresponds to the "ultimate underlying substance" and "ultimate undemonstrable principle".[2], designates the source, origin or root of things that exist, the element or principle of a thing.
We now have a pretty good estimate of how many ancestors our own species had at various times in the past. Our ancestors went through two different phases of population “bottlenecking” (constriction): one occurred about three million years ago, when a large population declined to around 10,000 individuals. The authors note that while this may reflect population size decline associated with the origin of hominins after our split with the lineage that produced modern chimps, they also say that this could be an artifact of ancient genetic polymorphisms maintained by natural selection.
The second bottleneck is the one of interest, for it’s the one associated with a reduced population size as humans left Africa. For the Chinese, Korean, and European genomes, effective population size fell from about 13,500 (at 150,000 years ago) to about 1200 between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago. Now this is the effective population size, almost certainly an underestimate of census size, but that only makes the problem worse:
we never went through a bottleneck of anything near two individuals,
as the Biblical Adam-and-Eve story suggests.
We also see a somewhat less severe bottleneck in the African samples: from about 16,100 people about 100,000-150,000 years ago to 5,700 about 50,000 years ago. It’s not clear why the populations in Africa bottlenecked as well.Finally, we also see the population recover in size, with a huge increase in all populations beginning roughly 20,000 years ago. This clearly reflects population growth in both Africa and in areas colonized from Africa as humans expanded around the globe.
ANCESTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY
Genealogy: What We Are & Where We Come From
Genealogy is the archaeology of the soul, offering new depths of insight into ethnography, lineage and kinship. It looks beyond regional, continental, and psychic barriers. A coherence is experienced from within, bringing forth that which was formerly hidden. It includes not only the personal connections, but the myths of life-after-death and life-before-birth —the simultaneous reality of spirit and matter.
Commit the Body to the Ground
Genealogy becomes a radical embrace of the earth, our psychophysical ground and structural foundation. The common ground of psyche and matter is "deep" psychophysical correlates. Jung's psychoid realm is the physical and metaphysical ground of being. The divine masculine and feminine are primordial dimensions of reality.
In Mysterium Coniunctionis, Jung explained that the unus mundus corresponds with this transcendental psychophysical background of vast potential. Psyche and matter continuously emerge from that transcendental matrix -- the eternal presence of the singular creative act. We emerge from the broader universe that supports us.
Figure-Ground Modulation
Shared knowledge is the common ground -- shared "grounding." It teaches us to read our psychophysical landscape back to our own creation myth, grounded in universal creation motifs. It symbolizes the ultimate meaning of our own existence, and that of the cosmos.
By consciously descending into the depths, descending toward primordial time, into our long-buried past, we ignite a light in the darkness. The ancestors are figures of time and meaning.
Transgenerational Psychophysical Ground
Everything is already there from the beginning in the unconscious. We now know deep memory and heredity are closely linked. "Retrieval" doesn't mean the *same* but rather a "memory" of behaviors and attitudes that had previously been "forgotten." We dig, then dig deeper, and sift, and sort looking for some shred of new evidence because we feel it in our bones.
Jung notes, "The dissolution of our time-bound form in eternity brings no loss of meaning." (Letters Vol. 1, Page 343.) He described his vision: "The bodies are the individual lives, twisting and turning and writhing themselves into a sort of pattern that dissolves and reforms again and again. It is the river of time, of life, in other words." (Visions Seminar, Page 321)
Don't Forget They Were Our Creators
Genealogy is a living demonstration of the newness of the old as well as the oldness of the new. According to Jung, when a personal experience corresponds to a latent primordial image, an archetype is activated. The new model is contemplation, participation, comprehension, poesis. Poetry has a way of "plumbing the depths." Human consciousness is an embodied self-referential system, symbolized in Uroboros.
Esther Harding describes how Jung "found a symbol of the psychic structure which joins into an organic unity everything from the mineral world through the animal, the unconscious and ordinary consciousness up to the Anthropos, which is quality-less and so, like the old Uroboros, touches the primordial condition of Chaos with its forces constituting matter, from which the whole cycle springs again." (C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters and Encounters, 171-179). Genealogy is a potent symbol of such a notion.
Gene Tree
The genealogy chart is a way to visualize and navigate the set of reconstructed ancestors, and narratives of pressures faced by our own ancestors. Everything about us as individuals is a product of complex interactions between our genetic instructions and aspects of the environments in which they are expressed [epigenetics]. If experience is not coming from the body it's not 'known' and going to change your life. The body contains the feeling which the soul gives the creative opportunity to expand.
Everyone alive today is descended from a long, long line of successful ancestors. There is a very good reason we rely on heuristics – evolution. Our distant ancestors when faced with complex life-threatening problems didn’t have time to weigh up the situation, so developed quick-fire methods.
Probabilities
But our ancient ancestors had access to little data other than their own ... Instead, they use quick and dirty heuristics that are less than perfect but that work well. Those that worked were passed down through generations, and we are still relying on them, often when we shouldn’t.
What advantage do we, humans, have? One is the ability to solve new problems, those on which evolution did not train generations of our ancestors. The brain has evolved many mental shortcuts, or heuristics. Heuristic shortcuts evolved that helped our ancestors deal with political problems in small-scale social groups.
However, the world we currently live in is radically different from the world our ancestors lived in when these mental heuristics evolved. In some instances heuristics can lead us to misjudge and make mistakes due to the biases that heuristics can blind us to.
Sense and Sensibility
True, the "sense" is often something that could just as well be called "nonsense," for there is a certain incommensurability between the mystery of existence and human understanding. ~Carl Jung, CW 12, Page 222
"Sense" and "nonsense" are merely man-made labels which serve to give us a reasonably valid sense of direction. ~Carl Jung, Psychology and Alchemy, Page 222
The pendulum of the mind alternates between sense and nonsense, not between right and wrong. ~Carl Jung, Memories Dreams and Reflections, Page 154.
Dreams Reach Forward; Wonder Reaches Back
How can we look at something and claim to know it if our own flesh isn't included? Instinct is felt physiologically and experienced as numinous images that seem to contrast to mere bodily sensations and mechanisms.
Archetypes are instincts "raised to a high frequency," just as instincts emanate from an archetype's "low frequency." Just as instincts impel toward behavior, the archetypes impel toward certain kinds of perceptions. Our task is to find our destiny lived from the wholeness or totality of our being.
People would rather hang on to the old dogmas than let experience speak.
--Jung, Letters Vol. II, Pages 598-599
For the Human Race, there are four, primary, types of blood. They are A, B, AB, and O.
The classifications are derived from the antigens of a person’s blood cells – antigens being proteins that are found on the surface of the cells and which are designed to combat bacteria and viruses. Most of the human population have such proteins on their cells. They are the Rh positive percentage of the Earth’s people.
Laurentian Comet - GLACIAL MELT PERIOD
When the Sky Fell & Earth Tilted
http://www.thecid.com/w3.htm
MTDNA Haplogroup W3 W3, together with W4, W5, and W6 were descendants of a woman with a 194 mutation born in northwest India around 14,000 years ago. W3 is identified by the further coding region 1406 mutation, and emerged around 13,000 years ago. W3's seem to have diversified into subgroups among the nomadic cultures of the Asian steppes south of the Aral Sea after the last glacial maximum. From there they spread via Russia into eastern Europe, perhaps with the peoples that brought the horse to Europe. There are two great divisions of W3: W3a, which appeared 12,000 years ago, and W3b, which appeared 8,500 years ago. Some branches in both divisions also migrated into India. Each lineage followed its distinctive route and timing.
The major families and their time of emergence are:
The classifications are derived from the antigens of a person’s blood cells – antigens being proteins that are found on the surface of the cells and which are designed to combat bacteria and viruses. Most of the human population have such proteins on their cells. They are the Rh positive percentage of the Earth’s people.
Laurentian Comet - GLACIAL MELT PERIOD
When the Sky Fell & Earth Tilted
http://www.thecid.com/w3.htm
MTDNA Haplogroup W3 W3, together with W4, W5, and W6 were descendants of a woman with a 194 mutation born in northwest India around 14,000 years ago. W3 is identified by the further coding region 1406 mutation, and emerged around 13,000 years ago. W3's seem to have diversified into subgroups among the nomadic cultures of the Asian steppes south of the Aral Sea after the last glacial maximum. From there they spread via Russia into eastern Europe, perhaps with the peoples that brought the horse to Europe. There are two great divisions of W3: W3a, which appeared 12,000 years ago, and W3b, which appeared 8,500 years ago. Some branches in both divisions also migrated into India. Each lineage followed its distinctive route and timing.
The major families and their time of emergence are:
- W3a, defined by the 15784 coding region mutation. This emerged in the steppes or northwest India around 12,000 years ago and led to the following subgroups:
- W3a1, defined by the 13263 coding region mutation, emerging in the stepes 11,000 years ago. The 13263 mutation also occurs in Haplogroup C. Therefore testing done to place results in a haplogroup, even if only HVR1 and/or HVR2 are tested completely, allows individuals to be identified by as W3a1 without a full genome test.
- W3a1a, defined by the 07151 mutation. W3a1a originated south of the Aral Sea around 10,000 years ago. It expanded via Russia into the Ukraine, Poland, Belarus, the Baltic states, and Finland.
- W3a1a1, defined by the 03421 mutation, which emerged in the Ukraine around 8,500 years ago. One distinct branch, with the 16291 mutation, appeared around 1000 years ago and is today found only among Ashkenazi descendants.
- W3a1a2, defined by the 05585 and 09127 mutations, which emerged in the Ukraine around 6,000 years ago and migrated into Western Europe. Modern descendents range from Russia to Ireland.
- W3a1a3, defined by the 15109 mutation, which emerged 3,000 years ago. Current descendents are found in Ireland and Britain.
- W3a1b with the 10245 mutation. This emerged 8,000 years ago, south of the Aral Sea or in northwest India. It migrated into eastern India and Sri Lanka.
- W3a1+199 with the 199 HVR2 change. This emerged 5,000 years ago in Europe and split into four further lineages, two of which have received official designations:
- W3a1c with the 07269 mutation. This emerged 4,000 years ago. One branch of this is found in the British Isles.
- W3a1d with 10398, 11890, and 15844 mutations. There are no results yet with definite Old World origins.
- W3a2 with the distinctive
Sol Luckman
There Is a Second DNA Code Which Controls Genes
http://themindunleashed.org/2014/01/scientists-finally-admit-second-secret-dna-code-controls-genes.html
2014: The fascinating and recent discovery of a new, second DNA code lends credence to what metaphysical scientists have been saying for millennia — the body speaks two different languages.
Since the genetic code was deciphered in the 1960s, researchers have assumed that it was used exclusively to write information about proteins.
But biologists have suspected for years that some kind of epigenetic inheritance occurs at the cellular level. The different kinds of cells in our bodies provide an example. Skin cells and brain cells have different forms and functions, despite having exactly the same DNA.
No Such Thing As Junk DNA
The human genome is packed with at least four million gene switches that reside in bits of DNA that once were dismissed as “junk” but it turns out that so-called junk DNA plays critical roles in controlling how cells, organs and other tissues behave. The discovery, considered a major medical and scientific breakthrough, has enormous implications for human health and consciousness because many complex diseases appear to be caused by tiny changes in hundreds of gene switches.
As scientists delved into the “junk” — parts of the DNA that are not actual genes containing instructions for proteins — they discovered a complex system that controls genes. At least 80 percent of this DNA is active and needed. Another 15-17 percent has higher functions scientists are still decoding.
Recent findings in the journal Science may have big implications for how medical experts use the genomes of patients to interpret and diagnose diseases, researchers said.
The genetic code uses a 64-letter alphabet called codons. Dr Stamatoyannopoulos with co-authors were stunned to discover that some codons, which they called duons, can have two meanings. One describes how proteins are made, and the other instructs the cell on how genes are controlled.
The newfound genetic code within deoxyribonucleic acid, the hereditary material that exists in nearly every cell of the body, was written right on top of the DNA code scientists had already cracked.
Controls Genes Rather than concerning itself with proteins, this one instructs the cells on how genes are controlled.
Its discovery means DNA changes, or mutations that come with age or in response to vibrational changes within the DNA, may be doing more than what scientists previously thought.
“For over 40 years we have assumed that DNA changes affecting the genetic code solely impact how proteins are made,” said lead author John Stamatoyannopoulos, University of Washington associate professor of genome sciences and of medicine.
“Now we know that this basic assumption about reading the human genome missed half of the picture,” he said.
“Many DNA changes that appear to alter protein sequences may actually cause disease by disrupting gene control programs or even both mechanisms simultaneously.”
These two meanings seem to have evolved in concert with each other. The gene control instructions appear to help stabilize certain beneficial features of proteins and how they are made.
The discovery was made as part of the international collaboration of research groups known as the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Project, or ENCODE.
DNA Responds To Frequency The Russian biophysicist and molecular biologist Pjotr Garjajev and his colleagues explored the vibrational behavior of the DNA. The bottom line was: “Living chromosomes function just like solitonic/holographic computers using the endogenous DNA laser radiation.” This means that they managed for example to modulate certain frequency patterns onto a laser ray and with it influenced the DNA frequency and thus the genetic information itself. Since the basic structure of DNA-alkaline pairs and of language (as explained earlier) are of the same structure, no DNA decoding is necessary.
While western researchers cut single genes from the DNA strands and insert them elsewhere, the Russians enthusiastically worked on devices that can influence the cellular metabolism through suitable modulated radio and light frequencies and thus repair genetic defects.
Garjajev’s research group succeeded in proving that with this method chromosomes damaged by x-rays for example can be repaired. Garjajev’s research group They even captured information patterns of a particular DNA and transmitted it onto another, thus reprogramming cells to another genome. So they successfully transformed, for example, frog embryos to salamander embryos simply by transmitting the DNA information patterns! This way the entire information was transmitted without any of the side effects or disharmonies encountered when cutting out and re-introducing single genes from the DNA. This represents an unbelievable, world-transforming revolution and sensation! All this by simply applying vibration instead of the archaic cutting-out procedure! This experiment points to the immense power of wave genetics, which obviously has a greater influence on the formation of organisms than the biochemical processes of alkaline sequences.
Sources:
washington.edu
preventdisease.com
sciencemag.org
Author: Michael Forrester
http://themindunleashed.org/2014/01/scientists-finally-admit-second-secret-dna-code-controls-genes.html
2014: The fascinating and recent discovery of a new, second DNA code lends credence to what metaphysical scientists have been saying for millennia — the body speaks two different languages.
Since the genetic code was deciphered in the 1960s, researchers have assumed that it was used exclusively to write information about proteins.
But biologists have suspected for years that some kind of epigenetic inheritance occurs at the cellular level. The different kinds of cells in our bodies provide an example. Skin cells and brain cells have different forms and functions, despite having exactly the same DNA.
No Such Thing As Junk DNA
The human genome is packed with at least four million gene switches that reside in bits of DNA that once were dismissed as “junk” but it turns out that so-called junk DNA plays critical roles in controlling how cells, organs and other tissues behave. The discovery, considered a major medical and scientific breakthrough, has enormous implications for human health and consciousness because many complex diseases appear to be caused by tiny changes in hundreds of gene switches.
As scientists delved into the “junk” — parts of the DNA that are not actual genes containing instructions for proteins — they discovered a complex system that controls genes. At least 80 percent of this DNA is active and needed. Another 15-17 percent has higher functions scientists are still decoding.
Recent findings in the journal Science may have big implications for how medical experts use the genomes of patients to interpret and diagnose diseases, researchers said.
The genetic code uses a 64-letter alphabet called codons. Dr Stamatoyannopoulos with co-authors were stunned to discover that some codons, which they called duons, can have two meanings. One describes how proteins are made, and the other instructs the cell on how genes are controlled.
The newfound genetic code within deoxyribonucleic acid, the hereditary material that exists in nearly every cell of the body, was written right on top of the DNA code scientists had already cracked.
Controls Genes Rather than concerning itself with proteins, this one instructs the cells on how genes are controlled.
Its discovery means DNA changes, or mutations that come with age or in response to vibrational changes within the DNA, may be doing more than what scientists previously thought.
“For over 40 years we have assumed that DNA changes affecting the genetic code solely impact how proteins are made,” said lead author John Stamatoyannopoulos, University of Washington associate professor of genome sciences and of medicine.
“Now we know that this basic assumption about reading the human genome missed half of the picture,” he said.
“Many DNA changes that appear to alter protein sequences may actually cause disease by disrupting gene control programs or even both mechanisms simultaneously.”
These two meanings seem to have evolved in concert with each other. The gene control instructions appear to help stabilize certain beneficial features of proteins and how they are made.
The discovery was made as part of the international collaboration of research groups known as the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Project, or ENCODE.
DNA Responds To Frequency The Russian biophysicist and molecular biologist Pjotr Garjajev and his colleagues explored the vibrational behavior of the DNA. The bottom line was: “Living chromosomes function just like solitonic/holographic computers using the endogenous DNA laser radiation.” This means that they managed for example to modulate certain frequency patterns onto a laser ray and with it influenced the DNA frequency and thus the genetic information itself. Since the basic structure of DNA-alkaline pairs and of language (as explained earlier) are of the same structure, no DNA decoding is necessary.
While western researchers cut single genes from the DNA strands and insert them elsewhere, the Russians enthusiastically worked on devices that can influence the cellular metabolism through suitable modulated radio and light frequencies and thus repair genetic defects.
Garjajev’s research group succeeded in proving that with this method chromosomes damaged by x-rays for example can be repaired. Garjajev’s research group They even captured information patterns of a particular DNA and transmitted it onto another, thus reprogramming cells to another genome. So they successfully transformed, for example, frog embryos to salamander embryos simply by transmitting the DNA information patterns! This way the entire information was transmitted without any of the side effects or disharmonies encountered when cutting out and re-introducing single genes from the DNA. This represents an unbelievable, world-transforming revolution and sensation! All this by simply applying vibration instead of the archaic cutting-out procedure! This experiment points to the immense power of wave genetics, which obviously has a greater influence on the formation of organisms than the biochemical processes of alkaline sequences.
Sources:
washington.edu
preventdisease.com
sciencemag.org
Author: Michael Forrester
In recent years, genetic studies have identified the gene change that caused lighter skin to occur in northern climates. Dr Francis Collins describes this:
"Recently a major molecular cause of this change in skin color has been discovered in Europeans. Specifically, the gene SLC24A5 turns out to be critical for the production of melanin, the predominant dark pigment of the skin and hair. ... 100 percent of Europeans have a mutation in SLC24A5 that impairs the function of the protein.... Asians share the fully functional version of SLC24A5, but have acquired mutations in other genes that result in lighter skin, while retaining black hair [Francis Collins, The Language of Life (NY: Harper, 2010), p 150]."
http://orvillejenkins.com/ethnicity/geneticsoutofafrica.html
"Recently a major molecular cause of this change in skin color has been discovered in Europeans. Specifically, the gene SLC24A5 turns out to be critical for the production of melanin, the predominant dark pigment of the skin and hair. ... 100 percent of Europeans have a mutation in SLC24A5 that impairs the function of the protein.... Asians share the fully functional version of SLC24A5, but have acquired mutations in other genes that result in lighter skin, while retaining black hair [Francis Collins, The Language of Life (NY: Harper, 2010), p 150]."
http://orvillejenkins.com/ethnicity/geneticsoutofafrica.html
NOT from Neanderthals
http://genetics.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/rh-did-not-come-neanderthals
Blood Types
Did Rh- blood come from Neanderthals? I have seen postings on the web that say that it entered human DNA around 35,000 years ago and that seems about right for coming from Neanderthals. -A curious adult from California
July 9, 2013
If the 35,000 number were right, then this wouldn’t be a bad guess. But that number is almost certainly incorrect. Rh- blood probably arose millions of years ago rather than tens of thousands.
Keep in mind that when I say Rh- here, I mean the form that is common in Europe. This is just one of lots of ways of being Rh-. This means there wasn’t some single event of outbreeding that explains all forms of Rh- blood. Lots of individual specific events have happened over our history.
And even if we do focus just on the form common in Europe, the 35,000 number still doesn’t work. This form predates modern humans settling down in Europe.
One of the big clues that this form of Rh- has been around for a long time is that it is the most common form in Africa as well as Europe. Now I don’t mean it is as common in Africa as it is in Europe. It isn’t. What I do mean is that even though being Rh- isn’t very common in Africa, if you have the blood type, then the most common way is the same in both Africa and Europe.
And don’t just take my word for this. Because there isn’t a lot of information out there about the evolutionary history of Rh- blood, I decided to consult one of the big names in the field, Dr. Bill Flegel of the National Institutes of Health. Here is what he had to say in an email when I asked about the 35,000 number:
35,000 years is very likely incorrect and too recent. The RHD deletion occurred in Africa, almost certainly before anyone migrated out of Africa. Keep in mind that the common RHD deletion worldwide is also *the* prevalent D negative RH haplotype in Africans today. How should that be, if the RHD deletion somehow occurred in connection with groups migrating out of Africa?
What this all means is that it is extremely unlikely that the common form of Rh- blood originated in Neanderthals and then spread into humans through breeding. It simply arose too long ago for this to be true.
This also means that even if we see evidence that Neanderthals had this form of being Rh-, that doesn’t mean we got it from them. A more likely explanation in that case is that we shared common ancestors who had the same form of Rh- blood in their blood.
I should mention that so far we don’t have any evidence either way about the Rh status of Neanderthals (although we do know that some of them had O blood type). The part of the DNA that is involved in Rh status is tricky to read and we haven’t yet been able to figure it out in Neanderthals. But again, even if we do see evidence of this form of Rh- blood in Neanderthals, this doesn’t mean we got it from them.
OK so Rh- blood almost certainly did not come from Neanderthals. It also did not come from aliens or anything else like that. Rh- blood is just another genetic variation like the ones that lead to red hair or blue eyes.
In fact, the gene involved in being Rh-, the RHD gene, is arranged so that DNA differences will spring up more often than in other DNA regions. This is why there are so many different ways to be Rh-.
So the tricky part isn’t explaining how the common Rh- form first arose. It is inevitable that this region of the DNA will turn Rh- every now and then. No the tricky part is explaining how something that can cause problems in pregnancy could become more common in Europe than elsewhere.
The most likely explanation is that being Rh- had some advantage in our past or maybe even today. Another possibility is that being a silent carrier might be useful. In either case, the advantage of being Rh- would outweigh the disadvantage of having problems with having Rh+ babies.
Rh- Spread
It is confusing that the Rh- blood type is as common as it is because it can have such profound effects. If an Rh- mother is pregnant with an Rh+ child, the child is at risk for something called hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN). And each child she has afterwards is at a higher risk.
Nowadays a woman can be given a couple of RhoGAM shots to prevent these problems from happening. But even a hundred years ago this wasn’t an option.
From a biological point of view, if being Rh- had only this effect, then Rh- women should have fewer children. This means that the DNA that leads to being Rh- should be passed down less often. Over time, being Rh- should become less and less common and, perhaps, even disappear.
But this clearly has not happened in Europe. Around 18% of people of European descent are Rh- compared with 1-3% of Africans (see the table at the end of the answer for a more statistics like this). Something weird seems to be going on in Europe.
One possibility is that the Rh- people happened to settle together. If everyone has Rh- blood, then there is no disadvantage to having it. Two Rh- parents are at little risk for an Rh+ baby which means the baby is at little risk for HDN.
There do appear to be some areas of higher concentration in Europe. For example, the Basques of the Pyrenees between Spain and France are 35% Rh-. That is a lot but still, 65% of them Rh+ and nowhere else in Europe is the concentration so high. This means that this is probably not the explanation.
Another possibility is that there is some advantage to having Rh- blood and/or carrying a silent version of it in your DNA. The latter case would make it similar to sickle cell anemia.
People with sickle cell anemia used to die very young in life. This makes it hard to understand why it is so common in certain areas of the world.
The reason it persists is that if you carried a silent version of the gene, you were resistant to malaria. The 1 in 4 chance for the child of two carriers to end up with sickle cell anemia was not as high as the risk of the parents dying from malaria before having kids. So, over time, this gene spread through the population.
We haven’t yet found anything so obvious for Rh- blood but a recent idea is that it may protect from a parasite called Toxoplasma gondii. It doesn't keep you from getting the parasite, but it might make the effects less severe.
Toxoplasma gondii affects people's motor skills. For example, it seems to slow down people's responses so they are more likely to get in car accidents.
A couple of recent studies showed that having one copy of Rh- and one copy of Rh+ protects someone from these effects. In other words, Rh+ people who carry a silent Rh negative copy of the RHD gene may do better in areas with lots of Toxoplasma gondii infections. Like in Europe, for example, where being Rh negative is much more common than other places in the world.
While we may not know the reason for the spread of the most common form of being Rh- in Europe, what we do know is that it did not suddenly appear in humans 35,000 years ago. Most likely it arose in Africa hundreds of thousands or even millions of years ago.
And what we also know is that Rh- blood will always be around because of how the RHD gene is set up in our DNA. Even if the most common form we have been talking about disappeared, a new Rh- form would take its place. Someone, somewhere will always be Rh-.
http://genetics.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/rh-did-not-come-neanderthals
Blood Types
Did Rh- blood come from Neanderthals? I have seen postings on the web that say that it entered human DNA around 35,000 years ago and that seems about right for coming from Neanderthals. -A curious adult from California
July 9, 2013
If the 35,000 number were right, then this wouldn’t be a bad guess. But that number is almost certainly incorrect. Rh- blood probably arose millions of years ago rather than tens of thousands.
Keep in mind that when I say Rh- here, I mean the form that is common in Europe. This is just one of lots of ways of being Rh-. This means there wasn’t some single event of outbreeding that explains all forms of Rh- blood. Lots of individual specific events have happened over our history.
And even if we do focus just on the form common in Europe, the 35,000 number still doesn’t work. This form predates modern humans settling down in Europe.
One of the big clues that this form of Rh- has been around for a long time is that it is the most common form in Africa as well as Europe. Now I don’t mean it is as common in Africa as it is in Europe. It isn’t. What I do mean is that even though being Rh- isn’t very common in Africa, if you have the blood type, then the most common way is the same in both Africa and Europe.
And don’t just take my word for this. Because there isn’t a lot of information out there about the evolutionary history of Rh- blood, I decided to consult one of the big names in the field, Dr. Bill Flegel of the National Institutes of Health. Here is what he had to say in an email when I asked about the 35,000 number:
35,000 years is very likely incorrect and too recent. The RHD deletion occurred in Africa, almost certainly before anyone migrated out of Africa. Keep in mind that the common RHD deletion worldwide is also *the* prevalent D negative RH haplotype in Africans today. How should that be, if the RHD deletion somehow occurred in connection with groups migrating out of Africa?
What this all means is that it is extremely unlikely that the common form of Rh- blood originated in Neanderthals and then spread into humans through breeding. It simply arose too long ago for this to be true.
This also means that even if we see evidence that Neanderthals had this form of being Rh-, that doesn’t mean we got it from them. A more likely explanation in that case is that we shared common ancestors who had the same form of Rh- blood in their blood.
I should mention that so far we don’t have any evidence either way about the Rh status of Neanderthals (although we do know that some of them had O blood type). The part of the DNA that is involved in Rh status is tricky to read and we haven’t yet been able to figure it out in Neanderthals. But again, even if we do see evidence of this form of Rh- blood in Neanderthals, this doesn’t mean we got it from them.
OK so Rh- blood almost certainly did not come from Neanderthals. It also did not come from aliens or anything else like that. Rh- blood is just another genetic variation like the ones that lead to red hair or blue eyes.
In fact, the gene involved in being Rh-, the RHD gene, is arranged so that DNA differences will spring up more often than in other DNA regions. This is why there are so many different ways to be Rh-.
So the tricky part isn’t explaining how the common Rh- form first arose. It is inevitable that this region of the DNA will turn Rh- every now and then. No the tricky part is explaining how something that can cause problems in pregnancy could become more common in Europe than elsewhere.
The most likely explanation is that being Rh- had some advantage in our past or maybe even today. Another possibility is that being a silent carrier might be useful. In either case, the advantage of being Rh- would outweigh the disadvantage of having problems with having Rh+ babies.
Rh- Spread
It is confusing that the Rh- blood type is as common as it is because it can have such profound effects. If an Rh- mother is pregnant with an Rh+ child, the child is at risk for something called hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN). And each child she has afterwards is at a higher risk.
Nowadays a woman can be given a couple of RhoGAM shots to prevent these problems from happening. But even a hundred years ago this wasn’t an option.
From a biological point of view, if being Rh- had only this effect, then Rh- women should have fewer children. This means that the DNA that leads to being Rh- should be passed down less often. Over time, being Rh- should become less and less common and, perhaps, even disappear.
But this clearly has not happened in Europe. Around 18% of people of European descent are Rh- compared with 1-3% of Africans (see the table at the end of the answer for a more statistics like this). Something weird seems to be going on in Europe.
One possibility is that the Rh- people happened to settle together. If everyone has Rh- blood, then there is no disadvantage to having it. Two Rh- parents are at little risk for an Rh+ baby which means the baby is at little risk for HDN.
There do appear to be some areas of higher concentration in Europe. For example, the Basques of the Pyrenees between Spain and France are 35% Rh-. That is a lot but still, 65% of them Rh+ and nowhere else in Europe is the concentration so high. This means that this is probably not the explanation.
Another possibility is that there is some advantage to having Rh- blood and/or carrying a silent version of it in your DNA. The latter case would make it similar to sickle cell anemia.
People with sickle cell anemia used to die very young in life. This makes it hard to understand why it is so common in certain areas of the world.
The reason it persists is that if you carried a silent version of the gene, you were resistant to malaria. The 1 in 4 chance for the child of two carriers to end up with sickle cell anemia was not as high as the risk of the parents dying from malaria before having kids. So, over time, this gene spread through the population.
We haven’t yet found anything so obvious for Rh- blood but a recent idea is that it may protect from a parasite called Toxoplasma gondii. It doesn't keep you from getting the parasite, but it might make the effects less severe.
Toxoplasma gondii affects people's motor skills. For example, it seems to slow down people's responses so they are more likely to get in car accidents.
A couple of recent studies showed that having one copy of Rh- and one copy of Rh+ protects someone from these effects. In other words, Rh+ people who carry a silent Rh negative copy of the RHD gene may do better in areas with lots of Toxoplasma gondii infections. Like in Europe, for example, where being Rh negative is much more common than other places in the world.
While we may not know the reason for the spread of the most common form of being Rh- in Europe, what we do know is that it did not suddenly appear in humans 35,000 years ago. Most likely it arose in Africa hundreds of thousands or even millions of years ago.
And what we also know is that Rh- blood will always be around because of how the RHD gene is set up in our DNA. Even if the most common form we have been talking about disappeared, a new Rh- form would take its place. Someone, somewhere will always be Rh-.
Suncode of Genetic Programming, Iona Miller, 1983
DNA is not merely a physical molecule; it is also the molecular form of universal creative consciousness, or “torsion” energy, as it self-transforms into what we perceive, belatedly, as the template for our physical bodies.
DNA is not merely a physical molecule; it is also the molecular form of universal creative consciousness, or “torsion” energy, as it self-transforms into what we perceive, belatedly, as the template for our physical bodies.
QUEST FOR THE HOLY GRAIL
Bloodline of Self-Knowledge & Self-Realization
Our DNA is like a history encyclopedia. It tells us the stories of our forebearers from the first human who walked on the earth to YOU. Different DNA regions can tell us whether our ancestors interbred with Neanderthals, while other regions tell us about the path our ancestors took out of Africa. It all depends on what you want to know and your ability to interpret the genetic code.
No scientific definitions for genetic ethnicity are universally accepted.
Differences in DNA sequences from person to person reflect the cumulative effects of human history. The patterns of genetic variation in the world today therefore carry a record of that history. They record the existence, sometime between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago, of a small group of people who are the ancestors of every person alive today. They chronicle the origins of “races” and “ethnic groups” and describe how those groups have both blended and separated over time.
Who Are We?
The best way to determine the genetic relationships among people is to compare the sequences of the nucleotides in their DNA. We perform a service just following the DNA trail and accepting new findings in our family trees when they come in, instead of clinging to an a priori theory/belief/wish or prejudice. Even with both a pedigree and genetic genealogy tests, the results require interpretation, and even different members of the same family can embody and display different features.
So far, there is no exclusive nor conclusive DNA signature for the Grail lineage, and there are gaps in the legends, the histories, and the pedigrees which require interpretation, if not leaps of imagination. This is as true for those of unbroken dynastic Houses as it is for those of mixed blood. Grail houses can have different Y haplogroups as well as different mtDNA signatures. While the “red gene” is significant, it may or may not distinguish noble ancestors. Typical medical problems of a line will not all present in one individual.
For example, Rh negative blood, being recessive, will only reveal itself when 2 recessive genes from the parents come together. Conceivably, only one sibling in a dozen might be Rh negative, descended from Rh positive parents. Even siblings get varied genetic packages and may not have genes from all the ethnicities or ancestors of their genealogical lines. There are different ethnic signatures.
Genetic Archaeology of ancient groups and individuals is a new research area. Genetic Archaeology is the study of genetic ancestry using modern forensic techniques to collect and blueprint ancient human remains, and rarely identify living descendants.
DNA can be used to understand the evolution of modern humans, trace migrations of people, identify individuals, and determine the origins of domestic plants and animals. DNA analysis, as one scholar put it, is “the greatest archaeological excavation of all time.” Because ancient DNA molecules are normally so few and fragmented, and preserved soft tissues so rare, scientists had little hope of finding and analyzing it. But two breakthroughs have made this possible: the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a method for copying any fragment of DNA, and the successful recovery of DNA from preserved hard tissues, bones and teeth, that are durable and relatively abundant. http://www.archaeology.org/9609/abstracts/dna.html
Your individual DNA fingerprint depends on how the chromosomes line up at conception. Some traits from both parents’ potentials will be there, while others get excluded. So, some siblings can be redheads, others not; some can have family medical problems, others not, some may be Rh neg., others not. Extensive historical knowledge of cultural practices and human migratory patterns helps us piece each story together. We may find things we never imagined and find no evidence for traits known within our lineage.
Genetic reconstructions of historical events can always be interpreted in somewhat different ways, observes Peter Underhill, the geneticist in Cavalli-Sforza’s lab who first detected variations in Y chromosomes. DNA is such a long and complex molecule that every act of human procreation produces at least some unique mutations. These mutations spill across the generations like an unusually shaped jaw or distinctively colored eyes. The result is an elaborate human genealogy, an intricately branching tree of genetic alterations.
Where Do We Come From?
By analyzing the genetic variation of modern Europeans, Cavalli-Sforza and Ammerman decided that Europeans are descended largely from populations of farmers who started migrating out of the Middle East 9,000 years ago. As the sons and daughters of farming families left their parents’ farms and moved into new territory, they interbred with the existing hunter-gatherer populations, which produced gradients of genetic change radiating from the Middle East. Only in mountainous areas unattractive to farmers—the Pyrenees homelands of the Basques, for example—were the genes of the indigenous peoples comparatively intact. Other historical events, too, appeared to have influenced the European gene pool. For example, a genetic trail leads from the area north of the Black and Caspian Seas into the rest of Europe. Cavalli-Sforza linked this trail to the spread of the descendants of nomadic warriors and herders who first domesticated the horse, about 4,000 B.C.
Evidence clearly indicates that sometime in the period 100,000 to 200,000 years ago our ancestors went through a severe genetic bottleneck. Perhaps an environmental change drove ancient people to the brink of extinction. A more likely scenario, however, is that a relatively small group, numbering fewer than 20,000 at times and probably living in eastern Africa, was isolated for many thousands of years from the many groups of archaic human beings scattered throughout Africa, Europe, and Asia.
The people who emerged from this genetic bottleneck had traits never before seen in human beings. They had lighter builds, new ways of interacting among themselves, and perhaps a greater facility with language. Eventually the descendants of these people spread throughout Africa and beyond. They reached Australia at least 60,000 years ago, probably traveling from the Horn of Africa and then along the South Asia shoreline. They arrived in the Middle East a bit more than 40,000 years ago. By 35,000 years ago anatomically modern people had spread into Europe from the Middle East and into East Asia from Southeast Asia. Sometime more than 12,000 years ago they entered the Americas.
Fewer than 10,000 generations separate everyone alive today from the small group of Africans who are our common ancestors. That’s much more than the twenty or so generations mentioned in Genesis, but it’s the blink of an eye in evolutionary terms. Even over thousands of generations human groups have not differentiated in any substantial way. Rather, the genetic evidence indicates that modern human beings have expanded as a single, relatively well mixed population without subsequent genetic bottlenecks (bottlenecks tend to erase the evidence of previous bottlenecks, which is how geneticists know that the bottleneck in Africa was the most recent one). Our comparative youth as a species accounts for our extreme genetic homogeneity. The chimpanzees living on a single hillside in Africa have twice as much variety in their DNA as do the six billion people scattered across the globe.
There’s another reason for our biological homogeneity. Modern human beings have never been able to resist for long what Noël Coward called “the urge to merge.” A person traveling due east from Madrid to Beijing (both at about 40°N latitude) would pass Italians, Greeks, Turks, Armenians, Uzbeks, Tajiks, Kyrgyz, Uighurs, Mongolians, and Han Chinese, among others. All these groups resemble their immediate neighbors more than they do groups farther away because of the continual exchange of mates across group boundaries.
There’s a simple way of describing our genetic relatedness. Not only do all people have the same set of genes, but all groups of people also share the major variants of those genes. Geneticists have never found a genetic marker that is of one type in all the members of one large group and of a different type in all the members of another large group. That’s why ethnically targeted biological weapons would never work. Every group overlaps genetically with every other. We have cultural differences masquerading as race problems.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2001/04/the-genetic-archaeology-of-race/2180/
Where Are We Going?
There is no singular gene, mutation, allele, STR or SNP that tells the whole story. There are clusters of mutations that show deep relationship patterns of regional origin in some individuals. There is no DNA report that is 100% conclusive. They use the statistical mathematics of the educated guess. Statistical and sampling flaws can lead to misinterpretations, based on too small of samplings and comparison studies. So, our own conclusions about our own DNA tests are, in part, interpretations of an interpretation. We can only draw inferences about the past based on the patterns observed in human DNA. And this is what keeps our quest alive.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2001/04/the-genetic-archaeology-of-race/2180/
allele /al·lele/ (ah-lēl´) one of two or more alternative forms of a gene at corresponding sites (loci) on homologous chromosomes, which determine alternative characters in inheritance.allel´ic
A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, pronounced snip) is a DNA sequence variation occurring when a single nucleotide — A, T, C or G — in the genome (or other shared sequence) differs between members of a biological species or paired chromosomes in an individual.
A surname DNA project is a genetic genealogy project which uses genealogical DNA tests to trace male lineage. Because (patrilineal) surnames are passed down from father to son in many cultures, and Y-chromosomes (Y-DNA) are passed from father to son with a predictable rate of mutation, people with the same surname can use genealogical DNA testing to determine if they share a common ancestor within recent history. A genealogical DNA test looks at a person’s genetic code at specific locations. Results give information about genealogy or personal ancestry. Generally, these tests compare the results of an individual to others from the same lineage or to current and historic ethnic groups.
Bloodline of Self-Knowledge & Self-Realization
Our DNA is like a history encyclopedia. It tells us the stories of our forebearers from the first human who walked on the earth to YOU. Different DNA regions can tell us whether our ancestors interbred with Neanderthals, while other regions tell us about the path our ancestors took out of Africa. It all depends on what you want to know and your ability to interpret the genetic code.
No scientific definitions for genetic ethnicity are universally accepted.
Differences in DNA sequences from person to person reflect the cumulative effects of human history. The patterns of genetic variation in the world today therefore carry a record of that history. They record the existence, sometime between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago, of a small group of people who are the ancestors of every person alive today. They chronicle the origins of “races” and “ethnic groups” and describe how those groups have both blended and separated over time.
Who Are We?
The best way to determine the genetic relationships among people is to compare the sequences of the nucleotides in their DNA. We perform a service just following the DNA trail and accepting new findings in our family trees when they come in, instead of clinging to an a priori theory/belief/wish or prejudice. Even with both a pedigree and genetic genealogy tests, the results require interpretation, and even different members of the same family can embody and display different features.
So far, there is no exclusive nor conclusive DNA signature for the Grail lineage, and there are gaps in the legends, the histories, and the pedigrees which require interpretation, if not leaps of imagination. This is as true for those of unbroken dynastic Houses as it is for those of mixed blood. Grail houses can have different Y haplogroups as well as different mtDNA signatures. While the “red gene” is significant, it may or may not distinguish noble ancestors. Typical medical problems of a line will not all present in one individual.
For example, Rh negative blood, being recessive, will only reveal itself when 2 recessive genes from the parents come together. Conceivably, only one sibling in a dozen might be Rh negative, descended from Rh positive parents. Even siblings get varied genetic packages and may not have genes from all the ethnicities or ancestors of their genealogical lines. There are different ethnic signatures.
Genetic Archaeology of ancient groups and individuals is a new research area. Genetic Archaeology is the study of genetic ancestry using modern forensic techniques to collect and blueprint ancient human remains, and rarely identify living descendants.
DNA can be used to understand the evolution of modern humans, trace migrations of people, identify individuals, and determine the origins of domestic plants and animals. DNA analysis, as one scholar put it, is “the greatest archaeological excavation of all time.” Because ancient DNA molecules are normally so few and fragmented, and preserved soft tissues so rare, scientists had little hope of finding and analyzing it. But two breakthroughs have made this possible: the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a method for copying any fragment of DNA, and the successful recovery of DNA from preserved hard tissues, bones and teeth, that are durable and relatively abundant. http://www.archaeology.org/9609/abstracts/dna.html
Your individual DNA fingerprint depends on how the chromosomes line up at conception. Some traits from both parents’ potentials will be there, while others get excluded. So, some siblings can be redheads, others not; some can have family medical problems, others not, some may be Rh neg., others not. Extensive historical knowledge of cultural practices and human migratory patterns helps us piece each story together. We may find things we never imagined and find no evidence for traits known within our lineage.
Genetic reconstructions of historical events can always be interpreted in somewhat different ways, observes Peter Underhill, the geneticist in Cavalli-Sforza’s lab who first detected variations in Y chromosomes. DNA is such a long and complex molecule that every act of human procreation produces at least some unique mutations. These mutations spill across the generations like an unusually shaped jaw or distinctively colored eyes. The result is an elaborate human genealogy, an intricately branching tree of genetic alterations.
Where Do We Come From?
By analyzing the genetic variation of modern Europeans, Cavalli-Sforza and Ammerman decided that Europeans are descended largely from populations of farmers who started migrating out of the Middle East 9,000 years ago. As the sons and daughters of farming families left their parents’ farms and moved into new territory, they interbred with the existing hunter-gatherer populations, which produced gradients of genetic change radiating from the Middle East. Only in mountainous areas unattractive to farmers—the Pyrenees homelands of the Basques, for example—were the genes of the indigenous peoples comparatively intact. Other historical events, too, appeared to have influenced the European gene pool. For example, a genetic trail leads from the area north of the Black and Caspian Seas into the rest of Europe. Cavalli-Sforza linked this trail to the spread of the descendants of nomadic warriors and herders who first domesticated the horse, about 4,000 B.C.
Evidence clearly indicates that sometime in the period 100,000 to 200,000 years ago our ancestors went through a severe genetic bottleneck. Perhaps an environmental change drove ancient people to the brink of extinction. A more likely scenario, however, is that a relatively small group, numbering fewer than 20,000 at times and probably living in eastern Africa, was isolated for many thousands of years from the many groups of archaic human beings scattered throughout Africa, Europe, and Asia.
The people who emerged from this genetic bottleneck had traits never before seen in human beings. They had lighter builds, new ways of interacting among themselves, and perhaps a greater facility with language. Eventually the descendants of these people spread throughout Africa and beyond. They reached Australia at least 60,000 years ago, probably traveling from the Horn of Africa and then along the South Asia shoreline. They arrived in the Middle East a bit more than 40,000 years ago. By 35,000 years ago anatomically modern people had spread into Europe from the Middle East and into East Asia from Southeast Asia. Sometime more than 12,000 years ago they entered the Americas.
Fewer than 10,000 generations separate everyone alive today from the small group of Africans who are our common ancestors. That’s much more than the twenty or so generations mentioned in Genesis, but it’s the blink of an eye in evolutionary terms. Even over thousands of generations human groups have not differentiated in any substantial way. Rather, the genetic evidence indicates that modern human beings have expanded as a single, relatively well mixed population without subsequent genetic bottlenecks (bottlenecks tend to erase the evidence of previous bottlenecks, which is how geneticists know that the bottleneck in Africa was the most recent one). Our comparative youth as a species accounts for our extreme genetic homogeneity. The chimpanzees living on a single hillside in Africa have twice as much variety in their DNA as do the six billion people scattered across the globe.
There’s another reason for our biological homogeneity. Modern human beings have never been able to resist for long what Noël Coward called “the urge to merge.” A person traveling due east from Madrid to Beijing (both at about 40°N latitude) would pass Italians, Greeks, Turks, Armenians, Uzbeks, Tajiks, Kyrgyz, Uighurs, Mongolians, and Han Chinese, among others. All these groups resemble their immediate neighbors more than they do groups farther away because of the continual exchange of mates across group boundaries.
There’s a simple way of describing our genetic relatedness. Not only do all people have the same set of genes, but all groups of people also share the major variants of those genes. Geneticists have never found a genetic marker that is of one type in all the members of one large group and of a different type in all the members of another large group. That’s why ethnically targeted biological weapons would never work. Every group overlaps genetically with every other. We have cultural differences masquerading as race problems.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2001/04/the-genetic-archaeology-of-race/2180/
Where Are We Going?
There is no singular gene, mutation, allele, STR or SNP that tells the whole story. There are clusters of mutations that show deep relationship patterns of regional origin in some individuals. There is no DNA report that is 100% conclusive. They use the statistical mathematics of the educated guess. Statistical and sampling flaws can lead to misinterpretations, based on too small of samplings and comparison studies. So, our own conclusions about our own DNA tests are, in part, interpretations of an interpretation. We can only draw inferences about the past based on the patterns observed in human DNA. And this is what keeps our quest alive.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2001/04/the-genetic-archaeology-of-race/2180/
allele /al·lele/ (ah-lēl´) one of two or more alternative forms of a gene at corresponding sites (loci) on homologous chromosomes, which determine alternative characters in inheritance.allel´ic
A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, pronounced snip) is a DNA sequence variation occurring when a single nucleotide — A, T, C or G — in the genome (or other shared sequence) differs between members of a biological species or paired chromosomes in an individual.
A surname DNA project is a genetic genealogy project which uses genealogical DNA tests to trace male lineage. Because (patrilineal) surnames are passed down from father to son in many cultures, and Y-chromosomes (Y-DNA) are passed from father to son with a predictable rate of mutation, people with the same surname can use genealogical DNA testing to determine if they share a common ancestor within recent history. A genealogical DNA test looks at a person’s genetic code at specific locations. Results give information about genealogy or personal ancestry. Generally, these tests compare the results of an individual to others from the same lineage or to current and historic ethnic groups.
The Basque History of the World: Written by Mark Kurlansky
A brief attempt to tie the Basques to the Picts, ancient occupants of Britain who spoke a language thought to be pre-Indo-European, fell apart when it was discovered the Picts weren't non-Indo-European at all, but were Celtic. If, as appears to be the case, the Basque language predates the Indo-European invasion, if it is an early or even pre-Bronze Age tongue, it is very likely the oldest living European language.
Some writers describe Pictish as a Celtic language with an admixture of some non-Celtic substrate. The amount of Celtic influence on the recorded forms of Pictish names is considerable (about which, more later). In some cases, the influence may have been on the actual names themselves, but in many it can be demonstrated to be a later scribal artifact only affecting the recorded forms, similar to the recording of many vernacular names in Latinized forms. It is certain that whatever non-Celtic element existed in Pictish eventually disappeared. What is in question is whether that element had been reduced to mere vocabulary items in a Brythonic matrix by the time of the earliest records or whether non-Celtic Pictish was still a viable language at that point, although with significant Brythonic borrowings. The best argument for the presence of non-Celtic Pictish at a fairly late date comes from the Ogham inscriptions of the 8-9th century in which some non-Celtic element appears to be strongly present.
Of the non-Celtic element in Pictish, the best conclusion is that it is a remnant of one of the no-doubt numerous languages prevalent in Europe before the spread of the Indo-European language family. Basque is the only remnant of this type surviving today, although there are early records of others, such as Etruscan, that did not survive. (Other modern non-Indo- European languages such as the Finno-Ugric group arrived later than the Indo-European spread.) For this reason, some writers have tried to relate Pictish to Basque directly. There seems to be no direct evidence for this, and to assume a relation simply based on being non-Indo-European is nonsensical. The origins and relations of the Pictish language may never be known, short of the discovery of some bilingual "Rosetta Stone".
http://www.s-gabriel.org/names/tangwysty…
--------------------------------------…
The Symbol Stones of Scotland, by Anthony Jackson (Orkney Press 1984).
The author of the article says: I do not agree with Jackson's conclusions, which are that the inscriptions are not writing at all but were used for counting says (i.e. the were calendars). Jackson claims that the Picts were Celts who spoke a language related to Welsh. There is no dispute that they spoke a P-Celtic language in addition to another, non Indo-European language. It is this other language that is written in the inscriptions.
All of the inscriptions are written in a known alphabet (Ogham), most are pronounceable and some have common elements (e.g. maqq/meqq, nehht/nahht, -ors). The only other sources of information on Pictish are the lists of kings and a very few inscriptions in the Roman alphabet: "resad fili spusscio", "drosten ipe uoret ett forcus" and "pidarnoin". Many of the Pictish names are not Indo-European, e.g. Usconbuts, Canutulachama, Spusscio. I would guess that, since the first N Pictish kings on one of the list were all called Brude followed by another name, that Brude is the Pictish for king.
Unfortunately there are too few inscriptions, no Rosetta Stone, no languages desended from Pictish and no known relatives (Basque has been mooted as a possibility). This means that, unless something turns up (like a long inscription accompanied by a translation into Latin), it is unlikely that the inscriptions will ever be deciphered. It is possible that there are some words borrowed into Gaelic or Scots, but I wouldn't count on it. After all, Ancient British hasn't exactly made it into English in a big way. The "Pit-" element in many Scottish place names has been related to the Welsh "peth" and Gaelic "cuid", and so may be Celtic.
Pictish Ogham Inscriptions: There have been many fanciful attempts to translate the inscriptions based, for example, on the assumption that they are a form of Basque. My own attempt is less ambitious. It is generally believed that maqq/meqq means son and was borrowed from Gaelic. The inscriptions are often accompanied by symbols (animals or abstract designs) which are believed by Dr Ross Sampson to be (stand clear of the pun) pictograms. One of these accompanies similar inscriptions ("eddarrnonn" in Ogham and "pidarnoin" in Roman scripts: Ogham has no letter P).
http://web.onetel.net.uk/~hibou/Pictish%… (interesting link)
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/02/the-basques-may-not-be-who-we-think-they-are/#.UioGcXdvDTo
The Basques may not be who we think they are
The Priestess - John William Godward
(c)2013; All Rights Reserved, Iona Miller, Sangreality Trust
[email protected]
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
[email protected]
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.